When we talk about Literature, we seem to deem only of Shakespe are, Ernest Hemingway, William Wordsworth, Tagore or Nazrul. Why is it so? Why do we immediately rival to people from the past? Why cant we take away someone more recent? Maybe the answer lies in the fact that we dont take aim great writers in our time.
Consider Shakespeare. I hardly think at that place is any(prenominal) playwright who will ever match his excellence. Nobody as yet comes close. His work was written in the Elizabethan compass point notwithstanding we still dont seem to tire of him. He has continued to fascinate people to this day with the great plays he wrote. thither are people who keep making movies from his plays. There are teachers who never line up bored of teaching his work. Finally, thither are people like me who never stop get pleasure from reading his work. There is undoubtedly no opposition for Shakespeare. Of course, there are other good playwrights too, who find win a good deal of fame. But at present, there are no great names worth considering.
tout ensemble the authors that we talk about belong to the past. Consider Hemingway, Orwell, D.H. Lawrence, Jane Austin, and many other writers- so many of them that it will take forever to observe them. They were not simply dead writers. They were people who live on to this day.
Do you really think; fifty years from now, the writers of our period will be remembered? I hardly think so. So, what are we really looking at? Our future generations will have no Literature to enjoy from our time. Our most popular novelists are authors like Sidney Sheldon and Danielle Steel. But is that Literature! I hardly think there is any art in what they write. Their stories hardly have any deep meaning in them.
If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.
No comments:
Post a Comment