Nostalgia for Napalm

Listening to right-wing radio, one cannot help but notice a palpable nostalgia for the Vietnam War. Recently, people calling in to radio programs transaction with the presidential race tend to complain about hind end Kerrys eventual opposition to the war, implying that the U.S. war effort was somehow a righteous cause. The idea is that the U.S. effort, no matter how ideologically unnoticeable or politically misconstrued, was essentially altruistic as it represents an effort by the moral U.S. to share democracy with the rest of the knowledge domain (this, of course, before the evil lefty hippies stepped in and nixed the endeavor).

I despise to pop anyones bucolic fantasy of American flags flying everyplace Vietnamese rice fields, but the fact of the matter is that Americas sign involvement in Vietnam had little to do with democracy. After all, the U.S., anterior to sending large numbers of troops, provided almost all of the reinforcement for the French effort to re-establish themselves as a colonial power. In other words, the U.S. was supporting Western colonialism. The Vietnamese coalition (yes, it was a coalition by the way) opposed to France and later to the U.S. were clearly rubbish against colonialism.

For this reason, I think we should stop talking about the wide democratic effort of the U.S. in South-east Asia. When the war is viewed in terms of its original objectives, one cannot help but break up that the U.S. had no moral right to murder people in a country half-way across the globe With this in mind, my in the flesh(predicate) opinion on Kerry and the Vietnam period is that Kerrys opposition to the war and his discarding of his metals afterwards is one of the few really good reasons to vote for him.

If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.