Confusion State in Health Care Economics

Increasing costs link up to both health guardianship and health c be insurance, in concert with growing restrictions on govern ment funding for health care services for the needy create an environment in which more than and more people lose access to healthcare services. Changes on either the funding face or the treatment side of the equation may easily lead to a situationwherein a patient may be denied access to a precise treatment therapy. A serious implication of this situation is the potential defense team of access to necessary health care services for a large segment of the population.

The access dilemma is, in the ripe1980s, developing into a major health issue in the United States (US). Problems associated with access to health care services, generally, will in all likelihood worsen significantly, before beginning to improve.

One significant eye socket which is being affected by the factors of stintings and access is the speech communication of visible therapy services. Physical therapy is being affected by stinting f feignors, in that commercializeing and ownership relationships are developing amid some physical therapists and other health

3care professionals. Specifically, there are physicianownedphysical therapy services (POPTS), joint venture operations involving physicians and physical therapists, and contractural arrangements betwee

The Clayton Act is concerned with pocket dealing or tying contracts or arrangements, the acquisition of monetary fund or assets in corporations, and interlocking directorates of domestic corporations. Section 3 of the act prohibits any person or enterprise engaged in concern from installing a lease, contract, or sale with special conditions or agreements that the purchaser will not deal in the products of any competitor, where such(prenominal) conditions or agreements may either intimately lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly in any particular industry or line of commerce (Moore, 1976). Certainly, economic arrangements which tie physicians and physical therapists could be subject to this theatrical role of the antitrust law.

It has been pointedout that, in many instances, the free securities industry concept neither (1) provides equity in economic distribution, nor (2) eliminates economic injustice in many situations, regardless of the competitive escort (Shotter, 1985). It appears that the situation involving economic tieing arrangements between physicians and physical therapists is such a situation where inequities in distribution will occur, as aconsequence of higher prices for services, which are translatedinto restricted access to service. 11

REFERENCES

Shotter, A. (1985). Free market economics. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1985.

Lebergott, S. (1984). The Americans: An economic record. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

Meyer J. R., and Oster, C. V., Jr. (Eds.). (1981) Airline dere gulation: The early experience. Boston: Auburn House.

In the US, business combinations which have the effect of monopoly creation, or restraint of trade are illegal at a lower place the antiturst legislation enacted in this country. Depending upon the philosophical and political perspectives of the administration in office, and depending upon predominant economic conditions in the country, however, the application of antitrust laws in the U
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.