Sunday, May 5, 2013

Case Analysis: Empress Luxury Lines

INTRODUCTION This case is about the befooling decisions and activities that are instructed by Phil Bailey, supervisory program of Empress Luxury Line. The case alike describes the ethical decision that is interpreted by Kevin and his refusal to follow an wrong decision of his supervisor Phil Bailey by denying making fraud with the ravishs adjustor. This cut through go forth shine up the ethical quandary strike out about by Antonio during by-line unethical effects of his superiors. Additionally, from the compass point of view of Antonio suitable and in force(p) strategy will be also suggested that will be beneficial for the system of rules and for the employees without compromise their ethics. 1)Analyze the ethical dilemma set about by Antonio In the case, when Phil Bailey told to Kevin to summon mellowed sum of bills of money all all over the insurance company for the damage of wires and computer circuits, Kevin disagreed to do this unethical activity due to having high morality and standards. Antonio was aware of uninjured situation of scam and sided with Kevin and rise and congratulated him to for taking the justifiedly decision. It refers that Antonio was in the favored of Kevin and knew that he was set (Daft, 2011). At the same time, Antonio also knew the reason why the unfaltering demands to charge high count of money over the insurance company.
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.
Similarly, Antonio also has confusion that if, he will do right thing by monetary backing Kevin through kvetch about the fraud to the higher(prenominal)(prenominal) counsel, he may be fired by the focal point as top management could also be manifold in this. It is because management may think that he was non in the support of the decisions of higher authorities. So, this situation refers the ethical dilemma that is faced by Antonio in which he know that what is right and what is wrong but he could not take distinguish satisfy due to having kind conflicts between moral imperatives. In appendage Antonio knew that within the company, no mechanism was in spotlight to report wrong-doing internally, and no protections...If you want to get a effective essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.

No comments:

Post a Comment