Ethics in Business From a business purview, working below government contracts can be a very stipendiary proposition. In general, a stream of orders keep coming in, taxation increases and the comp some(prenominal) grows in the aggregate. The obvious downfalls to working in this trend are both higher quality expected as well as the extensive research and documentation undeniable for government contracts. If a pause fails to perform correctly, it can come minor glitches as well as problems that can drive serious repercussions, such as in the content semiconductor device case. When both the culpable component and company are found, the query arises of how extensive these repercussions should be. Is the company as an entity liable or do you look into individual employees within that company? From an ethical perspective one would energise to look at the mitigating factors of both the employees and their superiors on with the role of others in the failure of these components. Next you would have to analyse the final ruling from a corporate perspective and then we must examine the macro issue of corporate righteousness in order to attempt to find a resolve for cases like these.
The first mitigating factor involved in the National Semiconductor case is the uncertainty, on the part of the employees, on the duties that they were assigned.
It is plausible that during the testing procedure, an employee could not distinguish which parts they were to test to a lower place government standards and commercial standards. In some cases they might have even been misinformed on the final consumers of the products that they tested. In fact, ignorance on the part of the employees would fully excuse them from any moral responsibility for any damage that may result from their work. Whether it is decided that an employee is fully excused, or is...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment