Political Leaders: Julius Caesar & Richard Nixon

As to "whether it is better to be loved more than feared, or feared more than loved . . . atomic number 53 ought to be both . . . but as it is difficult for the twain to go together, it is much safer to be feared than loved" (Ebenstein 193). He discovered that

custody have less scruple in pique one who makes himself feared; for love is held by a chain of pact which, men being selfish, is broken whenever it serves their purposes' but fear is kept up(p) by a dread of punishment which never fails (Ebenstein 194).

Lest his readers return the wrong lessons, Machiavelli urged leading to be "cautious in accept and acting" . . . [and to] "proceed in a tempe regulate way of life with prudence and humanity" (Ebenstein 193). He particularly urged a prince non to "make himself feared in much(prenominal) a way that if he does non gain love, he at any rate avoids hatred" (Ebenstein 194).

Caesar was born into a fairly prosperous dismal family. He was exposed during his late childhood to the political conspiracies that enveloped proterozoic first century Rome. According to Duggan, he learned former(a) that "politics was a dangerous business in which end was often the penalty of failure" (31). Caesar's illustrious military occupational group in command of Roman legions began later after he was 42. He briefly displayed his courage as a preteen officer at the age of 18 with the Army in Greece. He then went on during the next two decades to a promising career

Nixon clearly shared Machiavelli's view of human nature. He said in 1990, "in general charm and safe personal relations do not affect people when their interests are at put on the line; the only appear that works is one to the head kind of than to the heart" (In the 207-208). In 1982, in his discussion of world leaders he had known, Nixon said, "'great leaders' are not necessarily good men" (Leaders 3). In citing as some of his heroes in record, Peter and black lovage the Great, Napoleon and Julius Caesar, Nixon added, "only occasionally do we refer to those who embossed statecraft to a higher moral plane. Rather, we are talking about those who so effectively wielded power on such a grand scale that they significantly changed the course of history" (Leaders 3).

Whatever the reason, Nixon often appeared in public to be a stiff, uncomfortable, calculating, and even a programmed personality. According to Wicker, "a great umteen Americans admired and respected --some loved-- him. Perhaps as many feared and disliked --even despised --him" (21). He says that "the instinct of many Americans [was] that he was not what he seemed" (22). While Nixon proved to be a good vote getter in many elections (but not in others), at that place still remained in many people's minds that Nixon was projecting an outer type behind which lay a different personality and not necessarily one which could be trusted. This feeling was captured by the annual Esquire magazine dubious achievement awards which invariably showed a show of a smiling Nixon and underneath the question: 'Would you buy a used car from this man?' In his famous draw speech of September 23, 1952, when Vice Presidential candidate Nixon offered an translation for the so-called slush fund of campaign contributions, Nixon bared his soul but he did so in a banknote which was reminiscent of the soap operas on television rather than square life. Nevertheless, the Checkers speech worked for him.

Caesar was unabashedly ambitious and would make batch
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.