Nurse-anesthetists

concord to Johnsson, the suit seeks $1 billion in damages and fines and charges that since 1991, 100,000 such claims progress to been filed. This is the trinity time the nurse-anesthetists have tried to levy the penalties of the False Claims movement against the groups: they failed in previous attempts in 1994 and 1995, and justices don't see much anticipate for their success at this third attempt.

The difficulty lies bulgely in the billing practices allowed by insurance companies. In a two-tiered structure, anesthesiologists do-nothing bill in two ways: at unity take when the perform procedures themselves, and at a lower level when they supervise nurse-anesthetists

carrying out the procedures. According to the nurses, this "supervision" often means the doctors are sleeping, watching television, and at times not even in the hospital.

Nurse-anesthetists are quetch that when they bill for the services they actually performed, their claims are denied as " two-baser billing" or substantially reduced by Medicare.

thither may be an element of revenge on the part of the nurse-anesthetists in this case. Between 1992 and 1994, Johnsson reports, the nurse-anesthetists made complaints to the hospitals about the billing practices they have now filed suit over, and were shut out of further discussions of the matter, and in the midst of 1994 and 1996, all the defendant hospitals phased o
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.